Caption Contest for a Free Blueprint for LSAT Logic Games

Blueprint LSAT Prep’s latest caption contest is all business in the front, party in the back.

That’s because you’re just one funny comment away from winning a free copy of our LSAT book, The Blueprint for LSAT Logic Games. All you have to do is submit a funny, LSAT or prelaw-related caption for the above photo. We’ll pick our favorite one, and the lucky scribe will win a free LSAT book. Ain’t no thing but a chicken wing, right?

The key is to be creative. Here are some past examples of Most Strongly Supported caption contest winners, to give you an idea.

We’ll announce the winner next week right here on the LSAT blog.

If you’ve already won a caption contest on the LSAT blog before, sorry, but you’re not eligible.

Limit one entry per person.

Caption away!

8 Responses

  1. Kaleigh says:

    “But my mom told me Mauve Dinosaurs came before the chicken AND the egg!”

  2. Gregory Myers says:

    Most boys with Rat Tails grow up to live in a Trailer. All people that live in trailer have at least one relative in prison. Some people who have both a rat tail, and a brother in prison appear on the Maury Paulvich show. All people who appear on the Maury Paulvich show are white trash. Johnny has a Mullet therefor he is white trash.

    The argument follows which flawed pattern of reasoning?

    A) It confuses having a sufficient condition of having a rat tail, and the necessary condition if being white trash.
    B) It concludes with out proper justification that people with rat tails and or mullets are white trash.
    C) Aplies a general principle to an entire group of people based on the white trash actions of a few members of that group
    D)Draws a conclusion on mullets based on assumptions made on those with rat tails
    E) The argument is sound, no logical deductions are necessary to know that when you see someone with a mullet or a rat tail, they are white trash.

  3. Nick Sanchez says:

    A well-mulleted young scientist is watching a group of infantile Ornithoids in an experiment to monitor the effects of a certain pesticide on diminutive fauna. Involved in the study are 5 birds — Bucky, Clive, Dingo, Flicky, and Greg — whose bodily statistics will be monitored while the pesticide is sprayed in their terrarium. All the subjects eventually lose consciousness, one after the other, in accordance with the following conditions:

    Flicky outlasts Dingo but passes out before Bucky
    Either Clive passes out immediately after Dingo or immediately before
    Greg is the last one to fall asleep.

  4. Stephanie says:

    Chick: “What do you think my chances are of getting into a T-14 school with a diversity statement about being one of octadecatuplets?”
    Mother Hen: “Depends on how many of your siblings apply!”

  5. Jeffrey B. says:

    Mullet’ed Boy: Mama, what do these chicks have to do with law school?

    Mama: Nothing, son…..but if you don’t hard study for the LSAT with Blueprint, you’ll end up serving chicken to people for dinner for the next 30 years; just like your worthless daddy.

  6. Jeni H says:

    I don’t need a law degree to impress the ladies, I have a mullet… And as we all can see chicks dig mullets.

  7. James Ingram says:

    “Which came first, the chicken or the egg?”

    “Hmm… let me ‘mullet’ over”

  8. Dan E says:

    Stop the madness & start studying

Leave a Reply

Your email will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>